Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7772 (AP)

Polisetty Sreenath Kumar, S/o Late P.Venkatachalam, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/31899/2014 · 2025-07-14

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010080472014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 31899/2014 Between: 1. POLISETTY SREENATH KUMAR, S/O LATE P.VENKATACHALAM,, AGED: ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE 2. POLISETTY JAYANTHI, W/O LATE P.VENKATACHALAM, AGED: ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE. BOTH ARE R/O FLAT NO: 403, KOTA'S RESIDENCY, KK LAYOUT. TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (ENERGY) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. A P SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. A P SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, REP. BY ITS ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER, OPERATION WEST SECTION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. M NIRANJAN MURTHY S/O M LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGED: ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS 5. M MANJULA W/O M NIRANJAN MURTHY, AGED: ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE. BOTH ARE R/O 11-1-64, GANDHI ROAD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PARTY IN PERSON Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. V R REDDY KOVVURI(SC FOR APSPDCL) 3. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 4. JAGARLAMUDIKOTESWARIDEVI(SC FORAPSPDCL) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: When this Writ Petition was listed on 08.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioners (Party-in-persons). This Court had directed the matter to be listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioners (Party-in-persons). 2. In this view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non prosecution. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 15.07.2025 DSV 86 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.31899 of 2014 15.07.2025 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No.W.P.No.31899 of 2014 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 3. 15.07.2025 GRKP, J Writ Petition is dismisses for Non prosecution. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV