Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77696 (ALL)

SUDHAKAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/10440/2025 · 2025-07-24

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123218 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10440 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sudhakar Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Pandey,Ashwani Kumar Mishra,Nagendra Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding to the respondent No.2 respondent authority to pay substance allowance to petitioner during suspension period with effect from date of suspension up to reinstatement of petitioner along with appropriate interest. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus to direct the respondent authority to pass appropriate order in the explanation/reply given by the petitioner in pursuance of letter issued by respondent no. 2 on 22.11.2024." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that his representations pending before respondent no.2 may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Sri Saurabh, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Saurabh, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made by learned standing counsel. The petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 District Magistrate, Mathura within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 25.7.2025 S.K.S. (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad