2025:JHHC:10511 --1-- C.M.P. No. 93 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI C.M.P. No. 93 of 2022 ---- 1. Soni Devi, aged about 36 years, wife of Late Rama Mahto (wife of deceased) 2. Sweta Kumari, aged about 17 years, daughter of Late Rama Mahto (daughter of the deceased) 3. Sulekha Kumari, aged about 15 years, daughter of Late Rama Mahto (daughter of deceased) 4. Shubham Kumar, aged about 12 years, son of Late Rama Mahto (son of deceased) Appellant Nos.2 to 4 are minors, represented through their legal guardian, mother Soni Devi (Appellant No.1) All are residents of Balidih, Mahto Tola, PO and PS – Balidih, District – Bokaro .... Petitioners -- Versus -- 1. Anand Kumar, son of Mukund Kumar (owner of Hywa No.JH 02U-4961), resident of H. No.16, Chitrapur, PO and PS – Chitrapur, District – Hazaribagh – 825301 2. M/s IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. (insurer of Hywa No. JH-02U-4961) represented through Legal Manager at Express Tower, 42A, Shakespeare Sarani, Flat No.3B, 3rd Floor, Kolkata – 700017, PO and PS – Shakespeare Sarani, District – Kolkata 3. Md. Riyazul, son of Subhani Miya (driver of Hywa No. JH-02U- 4961), P/R Bhadani Nagar, PO and PS – Gola, District Ramgarh, A/PR/OH – No.16, Chitrapur, PO and PS – Chitrapur, District – Hazaribagh .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Vivek Kr. Sharma, Advocate For O.P. No.2 :- Mr. Manish Kr., Advocate 2025:JHHC:10511 --2-- C.M.P. No. 93 of 2022 ---- 05/04.04.2025 This petition has been filed for restoration of M.A. No.26 of 2019 to its original file which has been dismissed for default on 28.02.2020 for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 31.01.2020. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the counsel for the petitioners was not keeping well and in between the time the defects have not been removed and now the defects have already been removed. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 – Insurance Company is present. 4. Considering that M.A. No.26 of 2019 only at the initial stage by way of peremptory order the said was dismissed and notice have not been issued upon the respondents and further considering that sufficient cause is made out to restore the said M.A., as such M.A. No.26 of 2019 is hereby restored to its original filed. 5. This petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/