MANOJ KUMAR GAUTAM AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS
WPIL/1951/2025 · 2025-07-27
Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77655 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77655 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123564-DB Chief Justice's Court Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1951 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Gautam and 6 others Respondent :- State of U.P. and 11 others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmala Yadav,Sukesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Ravi Prakash Pandey, Vineet Sankalp Hon'ble Arun Bhansali,Chief Justice Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
1. This petition purportedly in public interest has been filed by the petitioners inter-alia under the banner of one Shramik Sewa Samiti seeking to protect the land of Kabristan and action against the encroachers.
2. A perusal of the record indicates that stray representations purportedly on behalf of the Shramik Sewa Samiti have been made since the year 2008 seeking to make allegations with regard to the land in question, which indicated as Kabristan/Samadhi Sthal, which, in terms, is contradictory.
3. No material has been produced to establish the credentials of the said Shramik Sewa Samiti as to what are its bye-laws etc. and what cause the Shramik Sewa Samiti has got to do with the graveyard in question.
4. We do not find any reason to entertain the present petition at the instance of the petitioners and the same is, therefore, dismissed. Order Date :- 28.7.2025 nd/AKShukla (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ) Digitally signed by :- NISITH DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad