Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77653 (PNJ)

SATYAWAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/22342/2020 · 2025-09-26

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

212 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22342-2020 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 26.09.2025 SATYAWAN .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Pardeep Singh Poonia, Advocate Mr. Pulkit Dhanda, Advocate Mr. Dharampal Saini, Advocate Mr. Mukul Malik, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sunil Ranga, DAG, Haryana. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL) This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari for quashing of the impugned letter No. 08.01.2019-6 HGI dated 04.09.2020 (Annexure P-20) issued by respondent no.1 and impugned letter dated 06.10.2020 (Annexure P-21) issued by respondent no.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time, the instant petition has become infructuous. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) 26.09.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Anuradha 2025.09.26 04:07 I agree to specified portions of this document