Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7765 (GAU)

BIRAJ HAZOWARY AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS

WP(C)/1300/2022 · 2025-09-04

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010033932022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1300/2022 BIRAJ HAZOWARY AND ANR S/O- SRI ROHIT HAZOWARY, R/O- VILL.- SINGIJANI, P.O. DOHELA, P.S. DUDHNOI, DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM 2: SMTI. DEBILATA BASUMATARY D/O- SRI AKUL BASUMATARY R/O- VILL.- SINGIJANI P.O. DOHELA P.S. DUDHNOI DIST. GOALPARA ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, WPT AND BC DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WPT AND BC DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE DIRECTOR WPT AND BC DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 4:THE PIC ITP GOALPARA REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN PIC Page No.# 2/3 ITDP BOARD P.O. AND DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783124. 5:MANJIT RABHA C/O- OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN PIC ITDP BOARD P.O. AND DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783124. 6:SMTI. JAMINI BORO C/O- OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN PIC ITDP BOARD P.O. AND DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783124. 7:PRABID HAJONG C/O- OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN PIC ITDP BOARD P.O. AND DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783124. 8:SMTI. ARLIN CHANGMA C/O- OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN PIC ITDP BOARD P.O. AND DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783124. 9:SOURAB RABHA C/O- OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN PIC ITDP BOARD P.O. AND DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783124. 10:MAHAT RABHA C/O- OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN PIC Page No.# 3/3 ITDP BOARD P.O. AND DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783124 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J M A CHOUDHURY, MR. A B T HAQUE Advocate for the Respondent : SC, WPT AND BC, P HAZARIKA (r-4),T CHAKMA (r-4),MR. S R RABHA (r-4) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER 05.09.2025 It is seen that despite repeated orders passed by the Lawazima Court requiring the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of notice upon respondent no. 6, 9 and 10, no steps have been taken by the petitioner in this connection. Further, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners today. Mr. R. Dhar, learned Standing Counsel, Tribal Affairs Department is present. In view of the above position, this writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant