Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77649 (KAR)

US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED v. TE CONSULTING (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED

WP/17934/2022 · 2025-09-03

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34719 WP No. 17934 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.17934 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: SEA FACING BLOCK, 4TH FLOOR BHAVANI, TECHNO PARK CAMPUS, KARIYAVATTOM, TRIVANDRUM, KERALA - 695 581. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR. VINAYAK MOHAN. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.S. GANAPATHY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NIKHILESH RAO.M, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. TE CONSULTING (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 15, 15TH CROSS ROAD, MG LAYOUT, JP NAGAR 6TH PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078, Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34719 WP No. 17934 of 2022 THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR. SOMANNA C.M., POA HOLDER. 2. MR. SHOUVIK BHATTACHARYA AGED MAJOR (ADULT) HAVING HIS ADDRESS AT: 930 MOONLIGHT COVE COPPELL, TEXAS 75019-3158 USA. ALSO HAVING HIS ADDRESS AT 15, 15TH CROSS ROAD, MG LAYOUT JP NAGAR 6TH PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078. THROUGH HIS POA HOLDER MR. SOMANNA C.M. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASHANTH V.G., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 06.07.2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED LXXXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-89-COMMERCIAL COURT), BENGALURU AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34719 WP No. 17934 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Both learned counsel for the petitioner and respondents are present before the Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal of the writ petition. It is submitted that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and the petitioner has instructed his counsel to withdraw the petition. 3. Memo filed for withdrawal of the writ petition is accepted. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12