Umesh Kumar Singh @ Bachha Singh v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./67976/2025 · 2025-10-09
Rajesh Kumar Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77611 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77611 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67976 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2025 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran ======================================================
1. Umesh Kumar Singh @ Bachha Singh S/O Late Vindeshwari Singh R/O Village- Gram kamalpur, P.S.- Awtar Nagar, Distt.- Saran
2. Abhimanyu Kumar Singh @ Abhimanyu Singh S/O Umesh Kumar Singh @ Bachha Singh R/O Village- Gram kamalpur, P.S.- Awtar Nagar, Distt.- Saran
3. Atul Kumar Singh @ Atul Kumar S/O Umesh Kumar Singh @ Bachha Singh R/O Village- Gram kamalpur, P.S.- Awtar Nagar, Distt.- Saran
4. Anmol Singh @ Bhutkun Singh S/O Umesh Kumar Singh @ Bachha Singh R/O Village- Gram kamalpur, P.S.- Awtar Nagar, Distt.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 09-10-2025 Heard Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Awtar Nagar P.S. Case No. 2 of 2025, dated 05.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/109/303(2)/352/351(2) and 3(5) of the of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The prosecution case, in short, the petitioners along with others are alleged to have abused and assaulted the informant’s side with lathi, sword and khanti causing injuries to them. It is also alleged that when the informant came to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67976 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/3 rescue her husband, she was dragged with hairs and choked with her saree. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners No. 1, 2 and 4 have clean antecedent whereas petitioner No. 3 has one criminal antecedent but he is on bail in the pending matters. The allegation as alleged is false and fabricated although, the petitioners are named in the F.I.R. There is specific allegation is against petitioner No. 2 that he assaulted the informant and her husband although they have received injuries but injury report suggests that the injuries are simple in nature. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and also the fact that the injuries are simple in nature, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Awatar Nagar P.S. Case No. 2 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down
Patna High Court CR. MISC.
MISC. No.67976 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 3/3 under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:- (I) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed their criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned
order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
Saif/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T