- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43062 WP No. 4236 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.4236 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. BASAVARAJ MALLIKARJUN YERAGAL DEVELOPERS AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.107, NEELA GANGA NILAYA NEAR ST. PETERS SCHOOL NAGADEVANAHALLI BENGALURU-560056. PRESENT OFFICE ADDRESS AT NO.212, ARUNACHALAM LAYOUT, KOMMAGATTA, NEAR KENGERI SATELLITE CLUB BENGALURU -560 060 REG UNDER RERA ACT, 2015. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURENDRA N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND BENGALURU-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SHIVARAJ B DODDANNAVAR S/O B.S. DODDANNAVAR Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43062 WP No. 4236 of 2023 AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 317, NEW BBMP NO.880, 5TH CROSS,COCONUT TREE FRONT HOUSE, ABBISH REDDY LAYOUT, KAGGADASANAPURA BENGLAURU-560093. 3. GOUTHAM RAJENDRA MEHTA LANDLORD-1 M/S. PRITHWI AND CO 9 AND 10, 3RD FLOOR, SRI PUTTANNACHETTY COMPLEX, BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BASANAGUDI BENGALURU-560004. 4. N. BIMAL KUMAR M/S. PRITHWI AND CO 9 AND 10, 3RD FLOOR, SRI PUTTANNACHETTY COMPLEX, BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BASANAGUDI BENGALURU-560004. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER TO MODIFY INTEREST PORTION OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ORDER DATED 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 IN COMPLAINT NO. CMP/220406/0009321 (ANNEXURE-A) PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, THE RESPONDENT NO.1. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43062 WP No. 4236 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This petition is listed for 9th time for non-compliance of the office objections. Despite having been granted sufficient time, the learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply with the office objections. This non-compliance indicates that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- compliance with office objections. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10