Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31045 WP No. 21796 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 21796 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT.MUNIYAMMA @ SAROJAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS D/O CHIKKANNA @ MARIYANNA R/O GUNNAHALLI VILLAGE, KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK NOW RESIDENT OF NO.57 CHOLAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, HOSKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJASHEKARA H.M., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SMT. NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS W/O LATE ADAVAPPA.
2.
SRI DODDA LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O ADVAPPA.
3.
SRI NANDISH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O LATE CHIKKALINGAPPA,
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31045 WP No. 21796 of 2025
4.
SRI. BEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS S/O LATE ADVAPPA.
5.
SRI MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS S/O LATE ADVAPPA.
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 5 ARE R/AT SEETI MADAMANGALA VILLAGE, SUGATURU HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK.
6.
SMT. RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE ADVAPPA, R/AT HARIHARAPURA VILLAGE AVALAGURKI POST, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT.
7.
SMT. NEELAMMA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, D/O LATE ADVAPPA, R/AT SIGEHALLI VILLAGE YELDUR HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT.
8.
SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, D/O LATE ADVAPPA, R/AT CHIGALUR VILLAGE, BUIKOTE HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31045 WP No. 21796 of 2025
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1. ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 30-6-2025 PASSED IN O.S.NO.330/2025 ON I.A.NO.I BY THE III ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KOLAR AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE SAID APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER-XXXIX RULES 1 AND 2 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, WITH EXEMPLARY COSTS AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:
"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The petitioner prays that this Hon'ble court be pleased to permit her to withdraw the above petition as the same is not maintainable, with a liberty to file M.F.A before this Hon'ble Court and order for return of the Annexures produced in the above case, in the interest of justice and equity."
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31045 WP No. 21796 of 2025
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SJK List No.: 5 Sl No.: 4 CT: BHK