Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77606 (PAT)

Mohammad Jauny @ Md Hashmi Rafsan Jani v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./71441/2025 · 2025-10-09

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71441 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Mohammad Jauny @ Md Hashmi Rafsan Jani S/O Hira Rahi @ Heera Rahi R/O Village- Ganoun, P.S- Ghanshyampur, Distt.- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Renu Devi W/O Santosh Mandal R/O Village- Ganoun, P.S- Ghanshayampur, Distt.- Darbhanga. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Nafisu Zzoha, Advocate For the State : Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 09-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This is third anticipatory bail application on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner was rejected on merit vide order dated 17.06.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16881 of 2019 and thereafter, vide order dated 26.07.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 47910 of 2023. 3. This application does not reveal any new facts and circumstances for reconsideration of prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In view of the recent judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of G.R. Ananda Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71441 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/2 Babu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 176, this third anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is not maintainable. 4. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T