- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41105 WP No. 2562 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 2562 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. AHMED HASSAN S/O SHRI HASSAN ARABI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/O H NO.B-6, 3RD FLOOR ZANTYE BLDG CALCONDA MARGOA GOA-403 601. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMEER KASHIMJI, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS KEMPEGOWDA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AIRPORT AND AIR CARGO COMPLEX DEVANAHALLI BENGALURU-560 300. 2. THE ASSISTANT/DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE GOA REGIONAL UNIT FLAT NO.F-3/F-4 BLDG NO.A-1 CACULO ENCLAVE RESPONDENTS OPP FIRE SERVICE STATION ST INEZ PANAJI, GOA-403 001. 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41105 WP No. 2562 of 2021 ZONAL UNIT NO.8 (P) 2 IST STAGE 3RD BLOCK OPPOSITE BDA COMPLEX HBR LAYOUT KALYAN NAGAR POST BENGALURU -560 043. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ZONAL UNIT NO.8(P)2 IST STAGE 3RD BLOCK OPPOSITE BDA COMPLEX HBR LAYOUT KALYAN NAGAR POST BENGALURU -560 043. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER IN ORGINAL DATED 19.09.2019 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A, WHEREIN THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HAS ORDERED CONFISCATION OF THE AMOUNT SEIZED FROM THE PETITIONER UNDER PANCHANAMA DATED 23.11.2017 UNDER SECTION 121 OF THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962 WITHOUT ISSUING A MANDATORY SHOW CAUSE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 124(A) OF THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41105 WP No. 2562 of 2021 ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This petition is listed for 7th time for non- compliance of the office objections. Despite having been granted sufficient time, the learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply with the office objections. By order dated 10.01.2025, this Court had granted a final opportunity of two weeks time to rectify the said objections. This non-compliance indicates that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- compliance with office objections. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4