Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-7410-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 144 CRWP-7410-2025 Date of Decision: 10.07.2025 Bharti and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana.
***** Manisha Batra, J.(Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondent No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 5 and take action on their representation dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure P-5).
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 08.07.2025 before the Superintendent of Police, Rewari raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Rewari to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action DINESH BANSAL 2025.07.11 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRWP-7410-2025 -2- thereon.
3. Notice of motion.
4. Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paper-book be supplied to her during the course of the day.
5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is
disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in
order to protect their life and liberty.
(MANISHA BATRA) 10.07.2025
JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/ No Whether Reportable : Yes/ No DINESH BANSAL 2025.07.11 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh