Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77577 (KAR)

NASEER SHAIK v. UZMA MADEEHA

WP/1165/2025 · 2025-07-24

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28755 WP No. 1165 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 1165 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: NASEER SHAIK S/O. MOHAMMAD SHAFI SHAIK, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, PERMANENT RESIDING AT HOUSE NO. 8-2-159/1, SATRI NAGAR, BADVEL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 104, EDIRS AL AWADI BUILDING, (CITY BURGER BUILDING), NEAR UNION METRO STATION EXIT NO.2, OPPOSITE AL GHRAIR CENTER, MASHREQ BANK, DUBAI - U A E …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED IBRAHEEM ANWAR, ADVOCATE- ABSENT) AND: 1. UZMA MADEEHA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS #52, S.B.M COLONY, UDAYAGIRI, MYSORE-570 019. 2. NUHAAN SHAIKH, S/O. NASEER SHAIK, AGED ABOUT 17 MONTHS, (REPRESENTING BY MOTHER OF RESPONDENT NO. 1), #52, S.B.M COLONY, UDAYAGIRI, MYSORE-570 019. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28755 WP No. 1165 of 2025 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH TO IMPUGNED ORDER DATED:05.11.2024 MADE IN IA NO. 3/2024 CRI MISC 830/2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED 1ST ADDL. PRL. FAMILY JUDGE COURT AT MYSURU AS HIGHLY ARBITRARY AND ILLEGAL ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER When the matter came up on 02.06.2025 and 18.06.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Again on 23.07.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘dismissal’ today. 2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26