HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25689 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. List revised. None appears on behalf of the first informant. Heard Sri Prem Shankar, holding brief of D. K. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Yagvalkya Pandey, learned AGA for the State-Respondent and perused the record. The present bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 87 of 2025, under Sections 108, 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Airport, District Prayagraj. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case crime number. He submits that the marriage of the applicant with the deceased took place 18 years back.Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that when the applicant came to know about the drinking of Phenayal, he took his wife and immediately approached the hospital and made each and every effort to save her life. He further submits that there is no independent witness of the alleged incident. He submits that in the present case, charge-sheet has been filed and the applicant is not required for any custodial interrogation. In the medical report, the cause of death was not determined by the Doctor and the Viscera has been preserved. He further submits that the applicant has no illicit relation with another women and the allegation is totally vague and false. The applicant is languishing in jail since 22.06.2025. The applicant has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dileep Kumar Singh, Rohit Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dinesh Kumar Yadav, G.A. Surendra Singh Alias Pintu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) bail has been prayed for. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail, but could not dispute the above submissions raised by learned counsel for the applicant. Considering all those facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima- facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Surendra Singh Alias Pintu, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. September 22, 2025 pks BAIL No. 25689 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad