IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 205 Vijay Kumar Sharma Sh. Jitender Faridabad and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings the order dated Bench of this Court in CWP Sharma vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of directing the respondents herein to t Legal Notice dated 01.3.2023 (Annexure P of four weeks from 25.5.2023. affidavit of Shri Sumit Kumar, Joint Commissioner, Municipal COCP-2583-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2583 of 2023 Date of decision : Vijay Kumar Sharma Versus Sh. Jitender Dahia, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Faridabad and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate for Ms. Baani Chhiber Mahajan, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Jayant Puneet Bamal, Advocate for Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate for the respondent No.3. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent the order dated 25.5.2023 (Annexure P Bench of this Court in CWP-11049-2023 Sharma vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of directing the respondents herein to t Legal Notice dated 01.3.2023 (Annexure P of four weeks from 25.5.2023. The Compliance Affidavit dated 04.12.2024 by way of affidavit of Shri Sumit Kumar, Joint Commissioner, Municipal 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2583 of 2023 (O & M) Date of decision :-06.08.2025 …..Petitioner Dahia, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate for Ms. Baani Chhiber for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Jayant Puneet Bamal, Advocate for Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate for the respondent No.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying (Annexure P-1) passed by the Division 2023 titled as “Vijay Kumar Sharma vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of directing the respondents herein to take a decision on the Legal Notice dated 01.3.2023 (Annexure P-8 therein) within a period The Compliance Affidavit dated 04.12.2024 by way of affidavit of Shri Sumit Kumar, Joint Commissioner, Municipal VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.07 18.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Corporation, Farida respondents No.1 and 2, which is annexed on the file. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper- has been made, while passing a Speaking Order dated 29.2.2024 (Annexure R in the present petition. order dated 25.5.2023 (Annexure P passing a Speaking Order dated 29.2.2024 (Annexure R learned counsel prays that liberty be granted to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid Speaking Order 1) as per law, if so advised. passed in the present petition, the same is aforesaid August 06 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2583-2023 (O & M) Corporation, Faridabad has already been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, which is annexed on the file. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in -book. Perusal of the same reveals that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a Speaking Order dated 29.2.2024 (Annexure R-1) by the respondent-authority; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner order dated 25.5.2023 (Annexure P-1) has been complied with by passing a Speaking Order dated 29.2.2024 (Annexure R learned counsel prays that liberty be granted to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid Speaking Order dated 29.2.2024 (Annexure R 1) as per law, if so advised. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Speaking Order as per law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 6, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 bad has already been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, which is annexed on the file. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in Perusal of the same reveals that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a Speaking Order dated 29.2.2024 authority; thus, no cause survives Learned counsel for the petitioner also admits that the 1) has been complied with by passing a Speaking Order dated 29.2.2024 (Annexure R-1). However, learned counsel prays that liberty be granted to the petitioner to dated 29.2.2024 (Annexure R- In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.07 18.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-2583-2023 (O & M) 3 VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.07 18.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document