Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77574 (KAR)

INSIGHT CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT LTD v. TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

WP/8605/2020 · 2025-11-26

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48942 WP NO.8605 OF 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.8605 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: INSIGHT CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT. LTD. REP. BY ABHISHEK AGARWALLA, DIRECTOR, S/O SANTOSH AGRWALLA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO.57, 4TH FLOOR, 8TH MAIN, 3RD PHASE, NEAR SBI, J.P. NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VARDHAMAN V. GUNJAL., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA MAHANAGARDOOR SANCHAR BHAVAN, J.L. NEHRU MARG, OLD MINTO MARG, NEW DELHI - 110 002. REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON. 2. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, SANCHAR BHAVAN, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN, CGC) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE OFFENDING PROVISIONS OF THE TELECOM COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATIONS CUSTOMER PREFERENCE REGULATIONS, 2018 (6 OF 2018) Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48942 WP NO.8605 OF 2020 ANNEXURE-A AND THUS, INTER ALIA, A SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENT DATED 21ST DECEMBER, 2018 NAMELY THE TELECOM COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATIONS CUSTOMER PREFERENCE (AMENDMENT) RGULATIONS, 2018 10(2018) ANNEXURE-B AND THE CONSEQUENTIAL DIRECTIONS ISSUED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 13 OF TRAI ACT IMPLEMENTING THE TELECOM COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATIONS CUSTOMER PREFERENCE REGULATIONS, 2018, HEREINAFTER CALLED 'REGULATIONS'. THE SAID DIRECTIONS DATED 20TH JANUARY, 2020 ARE FILED HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-C; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition. 2. The said memo is taken on record and accepted. 3. Accordingly, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1