- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33408 WP No. 2651 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 2651 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: MR UTHAPPA B P AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O LATE B K PONNAPPA R/AT FLAT NO.102 HOYSALA LANDMARK KALPANA CHAWLA ROAD SANJAYNAGAR BANGALORE 560094 ADHAR NO.524901029673 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED SABIR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. JAI PRAKASH RAO., ADVOCATE) AND: MRS. MITHILA POONACHA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS W/O MR UTHAPPA B P C/O MR POONACHA M P BITTANGALA VILLAGE AND POST BEHIND ROTARY HIGH SCHOOL, VIRAJPETE, KODAGU DISTRICT-571218. AADHAR NO.334519070004 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. INDUSHRI S. RAO., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33408 WP No. 2651 of 2025 QUASHING/SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDERS DTD 17.02.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A PASSED IN MC NO. 5716/2022 BY THE I ADDL PRINCIPAL FAMILY JUDGE BANGALORE IN RESPECT OF IA NO.6 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT AND CONSEQUENTLY TO DISMISS IA NO.6 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PART-HEARD MATTERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER Both the parties have entered into compromise. Basing on the compromise, the order was passed on 17.02.2024 by the I Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore, and the said order is questioned before this Court. 2. On 09.04.2025, an interim order was passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court as follows: "learned counsel for the petitioner contends that vide order dated 17.02.2024, the petitioner had agreed to pay 50% of educational expenses and 50% monthly maintenance. Therefore, there shall be stay and execution of order dated 17.02.2024 subject to condition that petitioner paying/depositing Rs.12,500/- per month as maintenance to the respondent and petitioner shall pay 50% of the educational expenses of the minor child directly to the school or to the account of the respondent or to the Court. She shall pay the amount as per the order dated 17.02.2024. If there is any arrears, the same shall be paid within two months from today.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33408 WP No. 2651 of 2025 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the order, they have complied with the interim order. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner has not complied with the consent order i.e. impugned order dated 17.02.2024. A memo is filed seeking withdrawal of the petition. 4. The memo is taken on record and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Further, it is made clear that if the amount as per order dated 17.02.2024 is not paid by the petitioner, it is for the respondent to execute the order. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3