- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34478-DB RP No. 544 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T REVIEW PETITION NO. 544 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC RAMANAGARA DIVISION, KSRTC, RAMANAGARA, BANGALORE, NOW REPRESENTED BY KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICE, BANGALORE BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER, CENTRAL OFFICE, BANGALORE. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. S NIRMMALA., ADVOCATE (V/C)) AND: 1. SUMA A P W/O LATE R RANAGASWAMY AGED 27 YEARS, 2. PRATHEEKSHA R S S/O LATE R RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS MINOR 3. SHIVAMMA, W/O RANAGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 4. RANGASWAMY, S/O LATE RANGAIAH, AGED 69 YEARS, VIDE ORDER DATED:23.02.2023, R-4 IS DELETED Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34478-DB RP No. 544 of 2022 R-2 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN MOTHER R-1; ALL ARE R/O AVVERAHALLI VILLAGE, HONNANAYAKANAHALLI POST, MALUR HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159. …RESPONDENTS (R-1 - SUMA A.P; R-2-PRATHEEKSHA R S-(R-2 MINOR REP. BY R-1; R-3 SHIVAMMA - (ON HER DAUGHTER - IN- LAW, DUE TO ABSENCE OF R-3 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; VIDE ORDER DATED:23.02.2023, R-4 IS DELETED FROM THE ARRAY OF THE PARTIES) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 23/09/2021 PASSED IN MFA NO. 889/2020 AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDER THERE ON IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) 1. This review petition is filed seeking review of the judgment and order dated 23.09.2021 passed in MFA.No.889/2020 connected with MFA.No.8844/2019 (MV). This Court after considering the record and the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34478-DB RP No. 544 of 2022 submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, awarded the compensation to the claimants for 'loss of dependency' Rs.35,98,080/-. Besides loss of dependency, Rs.1,60,000/- was awarded towards 'loss of consortium' and Rs.30,000/- towards 'conventional heads'. Therefore, there was an enhancement of Rs.4,81,344/- to the compensation awarded by the claim Tribunal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that review applicants submit that, this Court has erred in considering the income of the deceased at Rs.16,858/- per month. The said income was considered on the basis of Ex.P-10 which was the Salary Certificate of the deceased for the month of May 2013. The petitioner has not placed anything on record, to dispute Ex.P-10 - salary certificate of the deceased. 3. Therefore, we do not find that this Court has committed an error of fact, law or jurisdiction while taking the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.16,858/- per - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34478-DB RP No. 544 of 2022 month. Hence, we find no substance in this review petition. 4. Therefore, we record that there is no error apparent on the basis of record which requires us to review the judgment and order dated 23.09.2021 passed in MFA.No.889/2020 connected with MFA.No.8844/2019 (MV). Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3