SOU. NIDHI VIPUL CHOPDA v. SHRI. CHANDRASEN VIJAYSINH DABHADE AND ORS
AO/89/2021 · 2025-12-12
Shri Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77544 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77544 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
sr.4-ao-101-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 101 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1770 OF 2019 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 101 OF 2021 WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 89 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1773 OF 2019 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 89 OF 2021 Shri. Vipul Vijay Chopda & Anr. .. Appellants Versus Shri. Chandrasen Vijaysinh Dabhade & Ors. .. Respondents Adv. Prathamesh Bhargude, for the Appellants. Adv. Sandeep Parikh a/w Prabhakar M. Jadhav, for Respondent Nos. 1 &
3.
CORAM: FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.
DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2025 P. C.
1. At the request of the Appellants (which is not objected by the Respondents) the following Order is passed : a) The Appeals from Order are disposed of . b) There will be no order as to costs. Mansi Shelke 1 SMITA RAJNIKANT JOSHI Digitally signed by SMITA RAJNIKANT JOSHI Date: 2025.12.18 14:36:10 +0530
sr.4-ao-101-2021.doc
c) The Appellants are free to apply to the Trial Court, if they so desire, for seeking any modification of the Order dated 14th June, 2019 passed by the Trial Court. It is made expressly clear that this Court has not given any liberty to the Appellants to file such an Application, and that if the Appellants file such an Application, it will be considered on its own merits after hearing the parties. d) In the light of the disposal of these Appeals, the Interim Applications are rendered infructuous and are disposed of as such.
[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.]
Mansi Shelke 2