JITESH RAMESHWAR MOHAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
BA/1790/2025 · 2025-12-19
Neela Kedar Gokhale
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77538 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77538 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Shivgan 29_BA_1790_2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1790 OF 2025 Jitesh Rameshwar Mohad …Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Sumedh Jagtap, with Aarti Jadhav, for the Applicant. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for the Respondent No.1 - State. Ms. Vilasini Balasubramanian, for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Sopan Wadkar, PSI-Pairavi, attached to Sakinaka Police Station, present. CORAM DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. DATED:
19TH DECEMBER 2025 PC:-
1. During the course of arguments, while this Court was not inclined to grant bail to the Applicant, Mr. Sumedh Jagtap, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application, once the statement of the Victim is recorded. 19th December 2025
Shivgan 29_BA_1790_2025.doc
2. Since the Applicant is in custody since 6th August 2023, the Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and in any event, frame charges and record the statement of Victim within six months from the date on which this order is placed before it.
3. Permission to withdraw is granted with the aforesaid liberty.
4. The Bail Application is disposed as withdrawn.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J) 19th December 2025 SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN Digitally signed by SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN Date: 2025.12.22 11:04:22 +0530