AMALA PRASAD v. BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. AT ALLAHABAD AND 3 OTHERS
WRIB/2845/2025 · 2025-09-22
Chandra Kumar Rai
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77538 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77538 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 2845 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Alok Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Azad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent- Gaon Sabha.
2. The instant petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent no.1/ Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj to decide the Review/ Recall Application No.4851 of 2024 (Smt. Malti Devi vs. Amala Prasad) filed in Revision No.85 of 2013-2014 (Amala Prasad vs. Malti Devi and others) within stipulated period.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforementioned review/ recall application against the order dated 28.10.2024 in Revision No.85 of 2013-2014 is pending before the Board of Revenue / respondent no.2 since 12.11.2024.
4. This Court vide order dated 28.7.2025 directed the Board of Revenue to submit a report in the matter.
5. In compliance of the order of this Court, learned Member, Board of Revenue submitted his report dated 22.9.2025, which is taken on record.
6. Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of report dated 22.9.2025 submitted that the last date fixed in the proceeding was 25.9.2025 and matter shall be disposed of expeditiously.
7. Considering the facts mentioned in the report dated 22.9.2025, the instant petition is finally disposed of directing respondent no.1 to decide the Review/ Recall Application No.4851 of 2024 (Smt. Malti Devi vs. Amala Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aprajit Yadav, Shyam Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Amala Prasad .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P. At Allahabad And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Prasad) filed in Revision No.85 of 2013-2014 (Amala Prasad vs. Malti Devi and others) after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him.
8. Accordingly, the writ petition is finally disposed of. September 23, 2025 Rameez WRIB No. 2845 of 2025 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad