Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77534 (KAR)

SRI K T RAJASHEKAR v. SRI. B CHANDRASHEKAR

RFA/320/2020 · 2025-09-18

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39390-DB RFA No. 320 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 320 OF 2020 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. 1(a) SRI. K.T. RAJASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O LATE K.T. GOWDA SINCE DEAD, REP. BY LR SMT. MEGHA B.R. AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS D/O LATE K.T. RAJASHEKHAR No.321, TSP ROAD KALASIPALYAM OPP: BENGALURU MADICAL COLLEGE BENGALURU-560 002 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. Y.V. PARTHASARATHY, ADVOCATE &) SRI. K.S. HARISH, ADVOCATE FOR LR'S OF DECEASED APPELLANT - (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI. B. CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O LATE BORAIAH 2. SMT. CHANDRAKALA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS W/O SRI. B. CHANDRASHEKAR Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39390-DB RFA No. 320 of 2020 3. MS. CHANDANA AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS D/O SRI. B. CHANDRASHEKAR 4. SRI. CHETAN AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS S/O SRI. B. CHANDRASHEKAR, MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SRI. B. CHANDRASHEKAR 5. SMT. GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS W/O LATE BETTE GOWDA 6. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS D/O LATE NARASE GOWDA 7. SRI. THILAK AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS S/O LAKSHMAMMA 8. MS. POOJA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS D/O LAKSHMAMMA ALL ARE RESIDING AT K. SHETTYHALLI VILLAGE SRIRANGAPATTANA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 438 …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.06.2019 PASSED IN OS No.53/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRIRANGAPATNA DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39390-DB RFA No. 320 of 2020 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) There is no appearance for the appellant. 2. Till today, office objections are not complied. Therefore, in view of the peremptory order dated 17.09.2024 passed by this Court, no further order is required. 3. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PN List No.: 4 Sl No.: 3