Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7753 (AP)

Gedala Raja Shekar, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/4868/2020 · 2025-09-14

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010080502020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4868/2020 Between: GEDALA RAJA SHEKAR, S/O.LAXMI GANESHWAR RAO AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC . STUDENT R/O.FLAT NO.303, SUVARNA RESIDENCY SRINAGAR COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DWARAKANAGAR POLICE STATION VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 4. A RAMA DEVI, , D/O.NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER OCC . ADDL. S.P. MARINE, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned proceedings of the Respondents in issuing the Impugned G.O.Rt.No.156 (Home) Services-I Department, dt.17.02.2020 whereby posting the 4th respondent at Visakhapatnam as illegal, arbitrary, colourable exercise of power detrimental to the interest of the petitioner and consequently repatriate the 4th respondent to any other place to enable the 3rd respondent to conduct the investigation 2 and to take impartial steps in Crime No.244 of 2019, dt.08.11.2019 pending on its file.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri N.Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter as the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.4868 of 2020 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh