Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:136304 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26984 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shariq Shaukat Respondent :- Union Of India And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Bhushan Singhal,Ali Bin Saif Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Abrar Ahmad,Shashank Shekhar Singh Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. Present petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- " I. Issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quash the order dated 19.06.2025 passed by the respondent no. 2 & 5 dated and/or II. Issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 06 to conduct the lab components; Hydraulics and Pneumatics Lab GR-II bearing Paper Code- PME692C, Workshop Practice-VI and Automobile Engineering Lab bearing Paper Code- PME693C and/or III. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 02 and 06 to process the marksheet of VI Semester of the petitioner and/or IV. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 02, 03 and 06 to allow the petitioner to register himself and take part in the counseling without any impediment and/or V. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 02, 03 and 06 to grant provisional admission to the petitioner in B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) Course." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that since the appeal is still pending before Executive Council of the University, therefore, he is not pressing the matter on merits. He prayed that Executive Council of the University may be directed to to decide the appeal expeditiously. 3. Per contra, Sri Shashank Shekhar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of University vehemently opposed the instant writ petition but he has not objected the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner for deciding the appeal pending before Executive Council. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abrar Ahmad, learned Counsel for respondent no.1, Sri Shashank Shekhar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 to 6. and perused the contents made in the petition. 5. Taking into consideration the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and no objection from other side, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. Taking into consideration the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and no objection made by learned counsel for the respondents, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Executive Council of the University to decide the aforesaid appeal in accordance with law expeditiously. 7.With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad