- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43729 RFA No. 1245 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1245 OF 2014 (RES) BETWEEN: SMT VENKATALAKSHMAMMA WIFE OF LATE B.M. SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.29, OLD NO.303 19TH "E" MAIN ROAD, 1ST "N" BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 010 …APPELLANT (BY SRI PAVAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT SHANTHAMMA @ SAKAMMA SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 1(a) SHRI DAYANANDA SON OF LATE SHRI K.VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.23, 3RD CROSS BASAVA SAMITHI BADAVANE SAPTHAGIRI LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA POST BANGALORE- 560 097 1(b) SRI SADANANDA SON OF K.VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.23, 3RD CROSS BASAVA SAMITHI BADAVANE SAPTHAGIRI LAYOUT Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43729 RFA No. 1245 of 2014 VIDYARANYAPURA POST BENGALURU- 560 097 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI NATARAJA H T, ADVOCATE) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41, RULE-1 R/W SECTION 96 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.06.2014 PASSED IN O.S.87/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE XXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Parties are present. They present a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure signed by them and their respective advocates. 2. Contents of the compromise petition is read over to the parties in Kannada language and they agree that the terms of the compromise petition depict the true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching the terms of the settlement. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43729 RFA No. 1245 of 2014 3. As such, there is no impediment for this Court to accept the compromise petition and dispose of the appeal in terms of the compromise petition. 4. Accordingly, the following ORDER (i) Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. (ii) Office is directed to pass modified decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise petition as part of the decree. (iii) No order as to costs. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR