Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77505 (KAR)

JAGADGURU TRADERS v. G S LOKESH

RSA/451/2022 · 2025-07-31

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29791 RSA No. 451 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 451 OF 2022 (RES) BETWEEN: JAGADGURU TRADERS COPRA MERCHANTS AND COMMISSION AGENTS RMC YARD TIPTUR TOWN REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SIDDALINGARADHYA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O ALTE SHANKARAPPA DODDAMARPANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI TIPTUR TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT- 572 101. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VINAYA KEERTHY M.,ADVOCATE) AND: G S LOKESH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O SHIVANANJAPPA GORAGONDANAHALLI TIPTUR TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT- 572 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NAGESH B S AND G P PRAKASH FOR C/R; SMT. SHRUTHI S P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI T C MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY) Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29791 RSA No. 451 of 2022 THIS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.02.2022 PASSED IN RA.No. 26/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMC., TIPTUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.07.2019 PASSED IN OS No. 504/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., TIPTUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Heard Sri.Vinaya Keerthy.M., learned counsel for appellant and Smt.Shruthi.S.P., learned counsel for respondent. 2. On behalf of respondent, it is submitted that the possession of the suit property has already being taken in the year 2023 itself through the process known law in a duly constituted execution petition, which has been filed to execute the decree of possession. 3. Therefore, in the present appeal, nothing survives to the considered further. Further, substantive - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29791 RSA No. 451 of 2022 question of law if any, needs to be considered is only academic in nature. 4. Taking note of these aspects the appeal would not survive for further consideration. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AMM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25