Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7749 (CHH)

URMILA BAIGA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/545/2025 · 2025-06-15

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:24205 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 545 of 2025 • Urmila Baiga W/o Shri Roopram Baiga Aged About 53 Years R/o Kududand Mata Chowraha Gali No. 4, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Secretary, Adim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Commissioner, Adim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Pandit Ravishanker Shukla University Parisar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Anusuchit Janjati Praman Patra Uccha Stariya Chhanbin Samiti Through Its Secretary, Pandit Ravishanker Shukla University Parisar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 6. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Udit Khatri, Advocate For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 16. 06.2025 1. The present application has been moved for restoration of WPS No. 5241 of 2009 which was dismissed on 24.07.2024. 2. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for applicant would submit that on account of some unavoidable circumstances, no one could appear before SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.06.16 17:31:40 +0530 2 this Court when the matter was taken up for hearing, therefore, WPS No. 5241 of 2009 was dismissed for want of prosecution. He would submit that the applicant has good case on merits and he is interested in pursuing the matter. He would pray to restore the writ petition to its original number. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose. 4. Heard. 5. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Shrivastava, and grounds raised in the application, the present application is hereby allowed. The WPS No. 5241 of 2009 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1,000/- payable to the Library Fund, High Court Bar Association, Bilaspur. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant