SAHIL SHARMA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/19323/2025 · 2025-07-14
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77488 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77488 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-19323-2025 1 124
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-19323-2025 Date of Decision: 14.07.2025
SAHIL SHARMA AND OTHERS ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present : Mr. K.K. Thakur, Advocate with Mr. Paras Khindri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL
, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondent to fix their pay under Revised Pay Scale Rules 2009.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that issue involved is no more res integra. This Court in order dated 13.09.2024 passed in Civil Writ Petition No.15896 of 2023 titled as ‘Saurabh Sharma and others Vs. State of Punjab and another’ has already settled the issue.
3. On being confronted with order dated 13.09.2024 passed by this Court in a bunch of petitions including CWP-15896-2023, Saurabh Sharma and others vs. State of Punjab and another, Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab expressed his inability to controvert applicability of abovesaid judgment to instant petition. Asgar Ali 2025.07.14 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-19323-2025 2
4. In the wake of order dated 13.09.2024 passed by this Court, instant petition deserves to be allowed and accordingly allowed. Respondent is directed to reconsider claim of petitioners as per judgment of this Court in Saurabh Sharma (supra). Let the needful be done within 6 months from today.
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE 14.07.2025 Ali Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Asgar Ali 2025.07.14 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document