BALVINDER SINGH MAKKAR ALIAS SUNNY v. STATE OF HARYANA
CRM-M/36527/2025 · 2025-07-14
Namit Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77480 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77480 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-36527 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Balvinder Singh Makkar @ Sunny
State of Haryana
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present: -
NAMIT KUMAR, J.
1.
BNSS, 2023 (Annexure P Panipat, in case No. CHI/444/2019 titled as “State of Haryana v. Balvinder” arising from FIR No.166 dated 28.12.2018 registered under Sections 323, 406, 498 District Panipat, vide which bail of the petitioner has been cancelled, bail bonds have been forfeited to the State and warrants of arrest have been issued against the petitioner and the subsequent ord fresh non-bailable warrants have be
2.
Court is not inclined to interfere in the impugned order, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that th 36527 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36527 Date of decision
Balvinder Singh Makkar @ Sunny Versus Haryana
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Mr. Yashveer Kharb, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, DAG, Haryana.
NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 for quashing of impugned order dated 07.07.2023 (Annexure P-2), passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panipat, in case No. CHI/444/2019 titled as “State of Haryana v. Balvinder” arising from FIR No.166 dated 28.12.2018 registered under s 323, 406, 498-A and 506 IPC at Women Police Station, District Panipat, vide which bail of the petitioner has been cancelled, bail bonds have been forfeited to the State and warrants of arrest have been issued against the petitioner and the subsequent ord bailable warrants have been issued against the petitioner. After arguing the case for some time and realizing that the Court is not inclined to interfere in the impugned order, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall surrender before the 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 36527 of 2025 Date of decision: 14.07.2025 ......Petitioner ......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Yashveer Kharb, Advocate, Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, DAG, Haryana. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of the for quashing of impugned order dated 07.07.2023 2), passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panipat, in case No. CHI/444/2019 titled as “State of Haryana v. Balvinder” arising from FIR No.166 dated 28.12.2018 registered under A and 506 IPC at Women Police Station, District Panipat, vide which bail of the petitioner has been cancelled, bail bonds have been forfeited to the State and warrants of arrest have been issued against the petitioner and the subsequent orders vide which issued against the petitioner. arguing the case for some time and realizing that the Court is not inclined to interfere in the impugned order, learned counsel e petitioner shall surrender before the RAVINDER SINGH 2025.07.14 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-36527 of 2025 trial Court therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
3.
by the petitioner, same shall be conside merits in accordance with law.
14.07.2025 R.S. 36527 of 2025 within a week and move an appropriate application, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. If any such application is filed by the petitioner, same shall be considered by the trial Court on its own merits in accordance with law.
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
2
and move an appropriate application, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. If any such application is filed red by the trial Court on its own (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE
: Yes/No : Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2025.07.14 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document