Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7748 (UTT)

RAJEEV TYAGI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/617/2024 · 2025-05-15

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.617 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Pranav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Bharat Singh, learned counsel for the private respondents. 4. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, made a statement at bar that after investigation, final report has been submitted against the petitioners on 25.04.2025. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 15.05.2025 AK