Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7748 (GAU)

SIMA RANI KURMI AND 3 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

WP(C)/939/2025 · 2025-02-20

Michael Zothankhuma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010033842025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/939/2025 SIMA RANI KURMI AND 3 ORS W/O- BICHITRA REE, VILL.- ALOICHERRA PART-VII, P.O. MANIPUR BAGAN, P.S. KALITACHERRA, DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN- 788165. 2: NAZRUL ISLAM LASKAR S/O- LATE JAHID UDDIN LASKAR VILL.- NIZ JALALPUR PART-I P.O. JALALPUR P.S. KATIGORAH DIST. CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788816. 3: BISHNU SINGHA S/O- BARAMDEW SINGH VILL.- ALOICHERRA PART-VII P.O. MANIPUR BAGAN P.S. KALITACHERRA DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788165. 4: ABU FABIAN LASKAR S/O- WISE UDDIN LASKAR VILL.- NIZ VERNERPUR PART-I P.O. VERNERPUR P.S. LALA DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788163 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTRMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. Page No.# 2/3 3:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. 4:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ADARSHA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. 5:THE MISSION DIRECTOR SAMAGRA SHIKSHA ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. 6:THE PRINCIPAL ADARSHA VIDYALAYA VILL.- ALOIOCHERRA P.O. MANIPUR BAGAN DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788165 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S B LASKAR, MR. A S TAPADER,MR. H A LASKAR,MS D DUTTA,F R LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU., SC, FINANCE,SC, SSA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER Date : 21.02.2025 Mr. S. B. Laskar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the notification No. AVS/Estt-Circle & Notification/2023/77 dated 11.02.2025, issued by the Managing Director, Adarsha Vidyalaya Sangathan, Assam, which states that the teaching and non-teaching staffs, who have been engaged as fixed pay employee, shall not be entitled for ROP benefits, he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to file afresh, by Page No.# 3/3 challenging the said notification. Mr. S. M. T. Chistie, learned counsel appears for the Secondary Education Department and Mr. B. Gogoi, learned counsel appears for the Finance Department. The prayer of the petitioner’s counsel is allowed. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant