( 1 ) 155 fa 151.10 BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT HELD AT HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Organized by High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad under section 19, of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act) 155 FIRST APPEAL NO. 151 OF 2010 MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION NANDURBAR VERSUS DEVANAND MADHAV BABAR AND ORS AND 156 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1428 OF 2011 MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION DHULE VERSUS SHRI GANESH KISAN JADHAV AND ORS AND 157 FIRST APPEAL NO. 842 OF 2013 THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MSRTC, DHULE VERSUS DNYANESHWAR ANANDA MAHAJAN AND ORS AND 158 FIRST APPEAL NO. 843 OF 2013 THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MSRTC, DHULE VERSUS DNYANESHWAR ANANDA MAHAJAN AND ORS AND 159 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1720 OF 2013 MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION NANDURBAR THROUGH ITS DEPOT MANAGER VERSUS SMT. SEEMA RAJESH MALVE AND ANR 2025:BHC-AUG:36357 ( 2 ) 155 fa 151.10 AND 160 FIRST APPEAL NO. 358 OF 2014 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 643 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1713 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1700 OF 2014 IN FA/358/2014 THE MSRTC THROUGH DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER AHMEDNAGAR VERSUS ARUN RAMCHANDRA ZENDE AND ANOTHER AND 161 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2269 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5133 OF 2007 M S R T C THROUGH THR DEPOT MANAGER VERSUS VASANTRAO NAMDEO DEORE AND ORS ….. Advocate for Appellant/S : Mr. D.S. Bagul ….. AND 162 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2732 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15704 OF 2016 MAHARASHTRA STATE REGIONAL TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THR DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, JALGAON DIV., JALGAON VERSUS VISHAL ASHOK SONKUL(WANI) THR NEXT FRIEND ASHOK PUNDLIK SONKUL(WANI) AND ANR ….. Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dhongade Anilkumar B. ….. ( 3 ) 155 fa 151.10 HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE Y.G. KHOBRAGADE (Head of the Panel) Shri Kishor R. Chaudhari (Retired Judicial Officer) Shri Avinash R. Borulkar (Member) Date : 13.12.2025 AWARD 1. The Law Officer of appellant- Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Mr. Avinash Satwaji Vishwas tenders on record withdrawal pursis along with the authority letters. He prays for withdrawal of appeals on the basis of authority letters. 2. The withdrawal pursis and authority letters are taken on record and marked as Exhibit 'X'. 3. In view of the withdrawal of the appeals, the amount deposited by the appellants in this Court or before the Tribunal is permitted to be withdrawn as apportioned by Tribunal. 4. If the entire amount is not deposited, then the balance amount shall be paid by the appellant to the respondents within a period of eight weeks from today and disbursement of the same shall be done as per the order passed by the Tribunal. ( 4 ) 155 fa 151.10 5. First Appeals are disposed of as withdrawn in view of withdrawal pursis. Pending Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed of. 6. Award be drawn up accordingly. 7. The request of refund of Court fees shall be processed by the office in accordance with law. 8. Appellants are directed to communicate this order to the respondents/claimants or learned counsel for the respondents in writing. (Avinash R. Borulkar) (Kishor R. Chaudhari) (Shri Y.G. Khobragade) Advocate D.J. (Retd.) Head of the Panel Member Member Date: 13.12.2025. mub