CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----36603 36603 36603 36603 225 225 225 225 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Mohan Kumar State of Haryana CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: Present Present Present Present: SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL 1. Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120 short ‘IPC’), 2. petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya petitioner is willing to join investigation and cooperate therein. 36603 36603 36603 36603----2025 2025 2025 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Mohan Kumar versus Haryana HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Pragyat Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana. ***** SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for registered at Police Station Palam Vihar, Gurugram. On 15.07.2025, the following order was passed: “Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.95 dated 27.02.2022 registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, 1860 at Police Station Palam Vihar, Gurugram; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre Inter alia contends that the only role ascribed to the petitioner that he has identified the seller; the petitioner is not a beneficiary & the petitioner is willing to join investigation and cooperate therein. Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the Adjourned to 12.08.2025. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 22.07.2025 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Police Station and join investigation. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when further called by Investigating Officer, the petitioner shall join the investigation. He shall abide by the condition(s) enumerated under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha 1111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH M M M M----36603 36603 36603 36603----2025 2025 2025 2025 Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: August 12, August 12, August 12, August 12, 2025 2025 2025 2025 ....Petitioner ....Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL for the petitioner. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of concession of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.95 dated 27.02.2022, under of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for Palam Vihar, Gurugram. the following order was passed: Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.95 dated 27.02.2022 registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 1860 at Police Station Palam Vihar, Gurugram; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. contends that the only role ascribed to the petitioner is s identified the seller; the petitioner is not a beneficiary & the petitioner is willing to join investigation and cooperate therein. On asking of the Court, Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 22.07.2025 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Police Station and join In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on his furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to the Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when Officer, the petitioner shall join the condition(s) enumerated under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.” ....Petitioner ....Respondent Bharatiya for grant of concession of , under of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.95 dated 27.02.2022 registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 1860 at Police Station Palam Vihar, Gurugram; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya is s identified the seller; the petitioner is not a beneficiary & the On asking of the Court, Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana, The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 22.07.2025 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Police Station and join In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on his furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to the Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when Officer, the petitioner shall join the condition(s) enumerated under Section MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.12 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----36603 36603 36603 36603 3. stated that pursuant to the order dated joined investigatio entire truth as also to arrest the person who had impersonated. 4. especially, the petitioner having joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is impersonated, the conditions as enumerated under Section 5. read granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned involves commission of an offence. 6. cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition stipulated under Section cause. 7. construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case. 8. August August August August 12, 12, 12, 12, 2025 2025 2025 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: 36603 36603 36603 36603----2025 2025 2025 2025 Learned State counsel (on instructions stated that pursuant to the order dated 15.07.2025 joined investigation, but his custodial interrogation is required entire truth as also to arrest the person who had impersonated. Keeping in view the entirety of the factual milieu especially, the petitioner having joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is being sought for only to arrest the person, who had impersonated, the interim order dated 15.07.2025 the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS This order should not be treated as “blanket” order. It will not be read granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to ntioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence. Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition tipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS or upon showing any other sufficient Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case. Pending application(s), if any, shall also s 2025 2025 2025 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No 2222 Learned State counsel (on instructions from SI Chunni Lal) has .07.2025, the petitioner has indeed custodial interrogation is required to unearth the entire truth as also to arrest the person who had impersonated. Keeping in view the entirety of the factual milieu of the case; especially, the petitioner having joined investigation and his custodial o arrest the person, who had .07.2025 is made absolute, subject to 482(2) of BNSS. This order should not be treated as “blanket” order. It will not be read granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to and will not operate in respect of any other incident that Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition or upon showing any other sufficient Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE ) has indeed to unearth the of the case; especially, the petitioner having joined investigation and his custodial o arrest the person, who had is made absolute, subject to This order should not be treated as “blanket” order. It will not be read granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to and will not operate in respect of any other incident that Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition or upon showing any other sufficient Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.12 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment