IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18353 of 2017 ====================================================== 1. Md. Shamim Akhtar S/o Md. Usman Gani, R/o Vill- Tikodih, P.O.- Madhurapur, P.S.- Kawakol, Distt- Nawada. 2. Sanjay Kumar, S/o Lalo Yadav, R/o Vill and PO- Itpakwa, PS- Kawakol, Distt- Nawada. 3. Md. Muskan Gani, S/o Numan Gani, R/o Vill- Tikodih, PO- Madhurapur, PS- Kawakol, Distt- Nawada. 4. Md. Shamim Ansari, S/o Md. Aziz, R/o Vill- Teliyagadi, PO- Lalpur, Kawakol, Distt- Nawada. 5. Pramod Kumar, S/o Chandeshwar Yadav, R/o Vill- Paharpur, PS- Kawakol, Distt- Nawada. 6. Upendra Kumar, S/o Deonandan Prasad, R/o Vill and PO- Shokhodewra, PS- Kawakol, Distt- Nawada. 7. Rinku Kumari, W/o Mahendra Prasad, R/o Vill- Bariarpur, PO and PS- Kawakol, Distt- Nawada. 8. Nitish Kumar, S/o Ganga Prasad Chaurasia, R/o Vill and PO and PS- Bakhtiarpur, Distt- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Adll. Director, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5. Regional Addl. Director, Magadh Division, Gaya. 6. The District Magistrate cum Collector, Nawada at Nawada. 7. The District Education Officer, Nawada at Nawada. 8. The District Programme Officer Estb., Nawada. 9. The Block Development Officer, Kawakol Block cum Secretary Block Teachers Selection Unit, Kawakol B 10. The Block Education Officer, Kawakol, Block, Kawakol, Nawada. 11. The Chairman Block Teacher Selection Unit cum Pramukh Kawakol Block, Kawakol. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amresh Kumar Sinha, Adv Mr. Rajan Ghoshrave, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, AC to GP-23 Mr. Aaruni Singh, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA Patna High Court CWJC No.18353 of 2017(8) dt.22-07-2025 2/2 ORAL ORDER 8 22-07-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AC to GP-23 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 11. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and the Respondent No. 11, at the outset, submits that petitioners have rushed to this Court seeking quashing of the order impugned in the instant writ application by which their services stand terminated when the petitioners have an alternative remedy of approaching the District Teacher Appellate Authority, Nawada. 3. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to assail the order of termination issued by the authority competent against the petitioners terminating their services, before the District Teacher Appellate Authority, Nawada. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. 6. It is made clear that if any issue of limitation arises, the District Teacher Appellate Authority shall keep in mind that petitioners were pursuing their remedy before this Court since 2017. Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U