CRWP-7393 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 262 Rupinder Kaur State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. 226 of the Constitution of India seeking Habeas Corpus for release of her minor daughter from the illegal custody of respondent Nos. 4 to 6. 2. SHO, City Raiko Nos. 4 to 6 along with the alleged detenue before this Court on the next date of hearing. On 18.07.2025, respondent No. 3 had appeared before this Court in person and had submitted that a raid was co respondent Nos. 4 to 6 several times but neither respondent No. 4 nor the alleged detenue was found residing there. 3. Ludhiana (Rural) has been filed. It is submitt 7393-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rupinder Kaur Versus Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed of the Constitution of India seeking Habeas Corpus for release of her minor daughter from the illegal custody of respondent Nos. 4 to 6. While issuing notice of motion on 10.07.2025, respondent No. 3 SHO, City Raikot, District Ludhianan was directed to produce respondent Nos. 4 to 6 along with the alleged detenue before this Court on the next date of hearing. On 18.07.2025, respondent No. 3 had appeared before this Court in person and had submitted that a raid was co respondent Nos. 4 to 6 several times but neither respondent No. 4 nor the alleged detenue was found residing there. Today, reply by way of affidavit of the DSP, Raikot, District Ludhiana (Rural) has been filed. It is submitt - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7393-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.08.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondents MANISHA BATRA Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for release of her minor daughter from the illegal custody of While issuing notice of motion on 10.07.2025, respondent No. 3 t, District Ludhianan was directed to produce respondent Nos. 4 to 6 along with the alleged detenue before this Court on the next date of hearing. On 18.07.2025, respondent No. 3 had appeared before this Court in person and had submitted that a raid was conducted at the premises of respondent Nos. 4 to 6 several times but neither respondent No. 4 nor the Today, reply by way of affidavit of the DSP, Raikot, District Ludhiana (Rural) has been filed. It is submitted therein and learned State -1- 2025 (O&M) 06.08.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Article issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for release of her minor daughter from the illegal custody of While issuing notice of motion on 10.07.2025, respondent No. 3- t, District Ludhianan was directed to produce respondent Nos. 4 to 6 along with the alleged detenue before this Court on the next date of hearing. On 18.07.2025, respondent No. 3 had appeared before this Court nducted at the premises of respondent Nos. 4 to 6 several times but neither respondent No. 4 nor the Today, reply by way of affidavit of the DSP, Raikot, District ed therein and learned State MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.08.07 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-7393 counsel has argued that despite making sincere efforts by the police officials, the whereabouts of respondent No. 4 or that of alleged detenue could be gathered and it seems that they have left area and are residing at some unknown place. It is also submitted that the Investigating Officer is making more efforts to recover the alleged detenue. 4. and going through the reply filed by the respondent the daughter of the petitioner has not been kept confined by respondent Nos. 5 and 6. Rather, it seems that she has eloped with respondent No. 4. An FIR has also been registered in this regard, which will be taken care of in due course of law. In view thereof, no further orders are called for in the present matter at this stage. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. 06.08.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 7393-2025 (O&M) counsel has argued that despite making sincere efforts by the police officials, the whereabouts of respondent No. 4 or that of alleged detenue could be gathered and it seems that they have left area and are residing at some nown place. It is also submitted that the Investigating Officer is making more efforts to recover the alleged detenue. Be that as it may, on hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the reply filed by the respondent the daughter of the petitioner has not been kept confined by respondent Nos. 5 and 6. Rather, it seems that she has eloped with respondent No. 4. An FIR has also been registered in this regard, which will be taken care of in due course of In view thereof, no further orders are called for in the present matter at this stage. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. 06.08.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable - counsel has argued that despite making sincere efforts by the police officials, the whereabouts of respondent No. 4 or that of alleged detenue could be gathered and it seems that they have left area and are residing at some nown place. It is also submitted that the Investigating Officer is making more efforts to recover the alleged detenue. on hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the reply filed by the respondent-State, it is apparent that the daughter of the petitioner has not been kept confined by respondent Nos. 5 and 6. Rather, it seems that she has eloped with respondent No. 4. An FIR has also been registered in this regard, which will be taken care of in due course of In view thereof, no further orders are called for in the present matter at this stage. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No -2- counsel has argued that despite making sincere efforts by the police officials, the whereabouts of respondent No. 4 or that of alleged detenue could be gathered and it seems that they have left area and are residing at some nown place. It is also submitted that the Investigating Officer is making on hearing the learned counsel for the parties pparent that the daughter of the petitioner has not been kept confined by respondent Nos. 5 and 6. Rather, it seems that she has eloped with respondent No. 4. An FIR has also been registered in this regard, which will be taken care of in due course of In view thereof, no further orders are called for in the present matter at MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.08.07 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document