Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77453 (KAR)

SMT GUNJURAMMA @ MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE YELLAPPA v. SRI HANUMANTHEGOWDA S/O ANJANAPPA

RFA/1777/2007 · 2025-11-03

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44176 RFA No. 1777 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1777 OF 2007 (MON) BETWEEN: 1. SMT GUNJURAMMA @ MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE YELLAPPA SINCE DEAD HER LR’S LR’S ARE ALREADY ON RECORDS AS APPELLANT NO.1 AND 2 2. SRI T Y GOVINDAPPA S/O LATE YELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.232, IMMADIHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. 3. SRI Y PAPANNA S/O LATE YELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT 233, IMMADIHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI P.M. SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI HANUMANTHEGOWDA S/O ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44176 RFA No. 1777 of 2007 2. SRI B NARAYANASWAMY S/O BYRANNA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 3. SMT RATHNAMMA W/O B NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 4. SRI C KRISHNAPPA S/O CHOWDAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR’S a) SMT.KRISHNAMMA WIFE OF LATE C.KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT IMMADIHALLI VILLAGE KRISHNARAJAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK b) SRI HARISH SON OF LATE C.KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDING AT IMMADIHALLI VILLAGE KRISHNARAJAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK 5. SRI VENUGOPAL S/O M NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 6. SRI NARAYANAPPA S/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, 7. SRI JAYARAM S/O LATE THAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 8. SRI NANDAKUMAR S/O DORESWAMY - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44176 RFA No. 1777 of 2007 AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 9. SRI V ANJANAPPA S/O LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 10. SRI D R GURUBASANNA S/O D RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, 11. SMT JAYAMMA W/O BHADRAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 12. SRI MAREGOWDA S/O MARAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR’S R/AT IMMADIHALLI8 VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. (a) SMT.RUKKAMMA WIFE OF LATE MAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT IMMADIHALLI VILLAGE KRISHNARAJAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK (b) SMT.YASHODAMMA DAUGHTER OF LATE MAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT IMMADIHALLI VILLAGE KRISHNARAJAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK 13. SRI MUNIYAPPA NAIDU S/O GANGAPPA AGED 69 YEARS, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44176 RFA No. 1777 of 2007 14. SRI SATISHA S/O C NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 15. SRI LOKESHA S/O DORESWAMY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 16. SRI RAMESHA S/O C NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 1 TO 16 ARE RESIDENTS OF IMMADIHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H R MANJUNATH & SRI V.N.KUMAR, ADVOCATES FOR R1, R2, R5, R8, R10, R11, R13 AND R16 –ABSENT; SRI D.M.MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R9 –ABSENT; R6, R12(a), R12(b), R14 AND R15 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED-ABSENT; VIDE ORDER DATED 14.10.2025, NOTICE TO R4(a) IS HELD SUFFICIENT –ABSENT; VIDE ORDER DATED 02.04.2018 SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R3, R4(b) AND R7 IS HELD SUFFICIENT BY WAY OF PAPER PUBLICATION -ABSENT) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 4.6.2007 PASSED IN O.S.No.540/1998 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN), BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44176 RFA No. 1777 of 2007 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for the appellants. Even on the last date of hearing there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. This Court suo motu adjourned the matter to today. Appeal is of the year 2007. The matter was also referred to Lok Adalat at the request of the parties. Even before the Lok Adalat, parties failed to appear and settle the matter amicably. Conduct of the appellants in not appearing before the Court or before the Lok Adalat, that too in an appeal of the year 2007 is taken note of. 2. Further, the decree is a money decree and taking note of the same, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR