PATTABOYINA PAVAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/4355/2025 · 2025-04-03
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7745 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7745 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010080572025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 4355/2025 Between:
1. PATTABOYINA PAVAN KUMAR, S/O PATTABOYINA MAHESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O D.NO.30-20-1/2, KOTI LINGAMVARI STREET, SEETHARAMAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-520002.
2. PATTABOYINA MAHESWARA RAO,, S/O LATE NAGAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O D.NO.30-20-1/2, KOTI LINGAMVARI STREET,
SEETHARAMAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-520002.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, ENVIRONMENT, FORESTS AND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522 237
2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE, ANDHRA PRADESH, PVS LAND MARK, NEAR APIIC TOWERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522 503
3. THE CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, RAJAHMUNDRY CIRCLE, OPP.ARTS COLLEGE, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THE DISTRICT FOREST OFFICER, NTR DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA, A.P.,
5. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, VIGILANCE -I OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE, PVS LAND MARK, NEAR APIIC TOWERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522
503.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any appropriate Writ,
order or Direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No. 5 in taking away the parts of Saw Mill without any notice, without having any power or authority or jurisdiction is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of Natural justice and also not furnishing any receipt for taking away the parts of Saw Mill unit running with valid saw mill licence is violative of Artic114,19 and 21 read with 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to return the parts of the saw mill which were taken away from the saw mill of the Petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the Respondent No.5 to return the parts of the saw mill taken away by him from the saw mill of the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. D KASIM SAHEB
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR FORESTS The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER: Sri Gopala Raju, learned Counsel appearing for the writ Petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
2. Permission granted.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No
order as to costs.
4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this
order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 03.04.2025 ANS
99 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 4355/2025 Date: 03.04.2025 ANS