Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30998 WP No. 19495 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19495 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI GOVINDAPPA S/O ASHWATHAPPA AGE 56 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KODIYALA KARENAHALLI BIDADI HOBLI, TALUK AND DIST. RAMANGARA-562109. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. GIRIJA PATIL B., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE TAHSILDAR, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA-562159
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH., AGA)
Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30998 WP No. 19495 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DTD 3.01.2025 VIDE ANNX-A ISSUE BY THE R-2 TO THE WP AND BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION OF PETITIONER SAGUVALLI CHIT MAY BE ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved of the impugned endorsement at Annexure-A dated 01.02.2025, whereby the Tahasildar, Ramanagara Taluk, has rejected the request made by the petitioner to receive kimmat and to issue saguvali chit.
3. It is the contention of the petitioner that the Committee for Regularization of Unauthorised Occupation has passed an order recommending grant of land in favour
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30998 WP No. 19495 of 2025
of the petitioner and therefore the petitioner insisted that kimmat should be collected and saguvali chit should be issued to the petitioner. However, the Tahasildar, in the impugned endorsement has clearly stated that the Committee which met on 10.11.2017 considered the application filed by the petitioner and rejected the same and therefore the question of collecting kimmat from the petitioner would not arise.
4. Having regard to the rival contentions, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Tahasildar is required to furnish a copy of the order dated 10.11.2017, which would enable the petitioner to raise a challenge to the same in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of, with a direction to the respondent – Tahasildar, Ramanagara Taluk, to furnish a copy of the order dated 10.11.2017 passed by the Committee for Regularization of Unauthorised Occupation to the petitioner. The copy shall
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30998 WP No. 19495 of 2025
be issued to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Liberty is also reserved to the petitioner to raise a challenge to the
order passed by the Committee, in accordance with law.
5. Learned AGA is permitted to file his memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY CT: JL