130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Avinash Kumar Union Territory of Chandigarh and CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present: Mr. Mr. Sanjeev Ghai, Advocate for the respondents. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show as to whether the petitioner had at any point of time been doing the vending work in the area under the respondents. 2. No case for interference is made ou accordingly dismissed. 3. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. 14.07.2025 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19378 Date of Decision: Avinash Kumar Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. Jasbir Singh, Advocate for the Mr. Sanjeev Ghai, Advocate for the respondents. *** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show as to whether the petitioner had at any point of time been doing the vending work in the area under the respondents. No case for interference is made ou accordingly dismissed. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 19378-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2025 …Petitioner …Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Ghai, Advocate for the respondents. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show as to whether the petitioner had at any point of time been doing the vending No case for interference is made out. The writ petition is All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show as to whether the petitioner had at any point of time been doing the vending t. The writ petition is RAJESH KUMAR 2025.07.15 09:27 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.