HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25216 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Case called out. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. Sri Ajay Kumar Pal, learned counsel for the informant is not present. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Yagvalk Pandey, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 3. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Sachin Chaudhary seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 310 of 2025, under Section 105 BNS, Police Station- Khair, District- Aligarh. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 06.06.2025. It is submitted that similarly placed co-accused, Omveer Singh @ Fauji, has already been enlarged on bail of by the Bench of this Court by orders dated 02.09.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 24288 of 2025, copy of the bail order produced by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, Omveer Singh @ Fauji, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. He has criminal antecedent of five cases, which has been explained in para 7 of the affidavit and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Niharika Singh Parihar, Suresh Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ajay Kumar Pal, G.A. Sachin Chaudhary .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) has been prayed for. 5. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the accused-applicant, Sachin Chaudhary involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. 9. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. September 11, 2025 v.k.updh. BAIL No. 25216 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad