Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7742 (UTT)

SAVED v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1018/2025 · 2025-06-13

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1 No. 1018 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Ram Nivas Singh Rana, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Saved’ S/o Talim is praying for regular bail in relation to First Information Report dated 14.05.2025 bearing FIR No. 522 of 2025 P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar, wherein, the present applicant has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 8/22 of NDPS Act. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and furthermore the alleged recovery of prohibited drugs as shown to be recovered from the present applicant is below a commercial quantity and further submits that the applicant has no previous criminal history. 5. He further submits that there is no substantial compliance of Section 50 of NDPS Act. 6. On the other side, learned State counsel have not disputed this fact that the alleged prohibited drugs, which is shown to be recovered from the present applicant is below a commercial quantity and have also not disputed that applicant has no previous criminal history. 7. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the alleged contraband, which is shown to be recovered from the present applicant, is below a commercial quantity and furthermore the applicant has no previous criminal history, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant ‘Saved’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 13.06.2025 PR