Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121319 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7700 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Megha Agarwal Respondent :- Subham Jain And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravikant Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to amend the prayer clause of the petition during the course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. The writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :-
"to issue a suitable order or direction to the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.4, Kanpur Nagar under Sections 13, 25 and 27 of Hindu Marriage Act the bearing Suit No.3216 of 2024 (Smt. Megha Agarwal Vs. Subham Jain and another) filed as long as back on 02.12.2024, as expeditiously as possible preferably within the period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court to meet the ends of justice;"
4. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the proceedings under Sections 13, 25 and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act are pending since 2024. It has been further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that appropriate directions be issued to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.4, Kanpur Nagar seized with the proceedings of divorce u/s 13, 25 and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act to decide the same within a stipulated time or in a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner brought attention of the Court to the provision of Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act which contemplates to conclude the trial within six months from the date of service of notice of petition on the respondents. 6. Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act is quoted as under:
"21-B. Special provision relating to trial and disposal of petitions under the Act.-(1) The trial of a petition under this Act shall, so far as is practicable consistently with the interest of justice in respect of the trial, be continued from day to day until its conclusion unless the Court finds the adjournment of
the trial beyond the following day to be necessary for reasons to be recorded.
(2) Every petition under this Act shall be tried as expeditiously as possible and endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of service of notice of the petition on the respondent. (3) Every appeal under this Act shall be tried as expeditiously as possible, and endeavour shall be made to conclude the hearing within three months from the date of service of notice of appeal on the respondent."
7. In view of the statutory requirement as contemplated under Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 8. The Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.4, Kanpur Nagar is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid pending proceeding before him, in accordance with law, expeditiously, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned as well as an opportunity to lead evidence in support of their case and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment, keeping in view the statutory mandate of Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act quoted above. 9. With these observation, this petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad