IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3096 and 3098 /2025 Decided on: 07.03.2025 1 CWP No. 3096/2025 Amit Khan …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 2 CWP No. 3098/2025 Naveen Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s): Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent(s): Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. These writ petitions have been filed for the grant of almost common substantive reliefs. Relief clause herein is extracted from CWP No. 3096/2025:- 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 “i) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in the nature of mandamus, order of directions directing the Respondents to regularize the services of the Petitioner w.e.f. the date when the Petitioner completed their two years' service on contractual basis i.e. from the date the Regularization Policy was liberalized, along with all consequential benefits, including the benefit of Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised pay) Rules, 2022 and the petitioner be accorded the benefit of Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised pay) Rules, 2022 after taking into account the services rendered by them on contract basis as having been appointed prior to 03.01.2022, as has been approved by the Cabinet on 14.10.2022. ii) That the respondent may kindly be directed to Grant Higher Stage of Pay in the Concerned Level of Pay Matrix i.e. Rs. 31200/- and fix their pay from due date i.e. after completion two years of regular service with all consequential benefits including the arrears along with interest @ 9%. iii) That the due and admissible arrear be paid to the petitioner along with interest and other consequential benefits.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the issue involved and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner(s) have already been adjudicated in Mohit Sharma and Anr. Vs. State of H.P. and others2. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner(s) would be content, if the cases of the petitioner(s) are considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time bound schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 22 CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024 3 4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matters, these petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioner(s) in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 07th March, 2025(rohit)