L. Krishna Kumari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Secretary
WP/5167/2016 · 2025-01-07
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7739 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7739 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010079482016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5167/2016 Between: L. Krishna Kumari, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Represented By Its Secretary and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V VENKATA MAYUR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP)
2. REVANURU SUDHA RANI (SC FOR SAMAGRA SHIKSHA) The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 & 3.
2. This writ petition is filed questioning the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 02.06.2015 to re-engage the services as Inclusive Education Resource Teachers on contract basis for the academic year 2015-16.
2
3. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 & 3 also submits that, since the petitioner belongs to the Telangana State, she could not be considered for the academic year 2015-16 by virtue of the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 02.06.2015. Anyhow, as the scope of the writ petition is for the academic year 2015-16 which expired long back, nothing survives in this matter.
4. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 07.01.2025 NNN