Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37415 WP No. 26765 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO.26765/2025 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. VIJAYA S/O LATE BASAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS WORKING AS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL NANJANGUD 571301.
2.
SRI. K. KRISHNA NAIK AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O KALINGA NAIK WORKING AS JOINT DIRECTOR MYSURU CITY CORPORATION MYSURU 5700010.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJA L, ADV.,)
AND:
1.
THE UNDER SECRETARY GOVT. OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560001.
2.
THE DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION V.V.TOWER, 9TH FLOOR
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37415 WP No. 26765 of 2025
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560001.
3.
THE COMMISSIONER CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CHAMARAJANAGARA CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT-571313.
4.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR LOCAL AUDIT CIRCLE STATE ACCOUNTS DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING 3RD FLOOR, D.C.OFFICE CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN CHAMARAJANAGARA 571313.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.J. ESWARAPPA, AGA FOR R1, R2 & R4)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT VIDE GOVT. ORDER NO.NA AA EEE 22/DMK 2023, BENGALURU DATED 06-06-2025, THE COPY OF THE NOTICE SAME IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-K, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37415 WP No. 26765 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
1. At the outset, learned AGA raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioners are holding civil posts and the issue is with regard to the service conditions and therefore, they have to approach the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal.
2. The grievance in respect of the ‘service matters’ cannot be a subject matter of adjudication at the hands of a writ Court, as the court of first instance, in the light of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of L.Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India and others reported in (1997) 3 SCC 261.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition is
disposed of, with liberty reserved to the petitioners to approach the appropriate legal forum, if law permits.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37415 WP No. 26765 of 2025
4. Registry is directed to return the original or certified copies of the documents, if any, to the petitioners, after retaining the photocopies of the same for record purpose.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6