- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37841 CRL.P No. 1802 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1802 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI V. DANIAL PAUL S/O PASTOR VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2. SRI VENKATARAMANA PAUL S/O LATE MALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 3. SMT. SHANTHA W/O PASTOR VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 4. KEERTHANA D/O PASTOR VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 5. SMT KAVITHA W/O SAMUEL PAUL, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 6. SRI SAMUAL PAUL D/O PASTOR VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS ALL ARE R/O 17/399-6-3, N.V.R. STREET, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37841 CRL.P No. 1802 of 2023 MADANAPALLE TOWN, CHITTOOR DIST. ANDHRA PRADESH-517325. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BHUKYA HANUMANTHA NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HOSAKOTE POLICE STATION, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE-562114 2. SMT. JEEVITHA W/O DANIAL PAUL, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O NO.26, KHB COLONY, HOSAKOTE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE-560079. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH ALL THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1521/2017 BEFORE THIS HONBLE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND J.M.F.C COURT, HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 6 HEREIN ARE CONCERNED FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S 143,498A,323,354(a),504,506,34 OF IPC AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37841 CRL.P No. 1802 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners. 2. No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session. 3. This matter is of the year 2023. 4. Vide order dated 12.06.2025, as a last chance, a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. 5. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. 6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6