APHC010079512007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 3828/2007 Between: 1. K.CHINNAKKA, KADAPA DISTRICT., W/O S.YESUPU, UNEMPLOYEE R/O YEDDULAYENI VILLAGE, PEDDAJUTURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, VEMULA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DIST COLLECTOR KADAPA DISTRICT 4 OTHERS, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT WOMEN AND CHILD, DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ICDS PROJECT, PULIVENDLA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, PULIVENDLA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. P MARIYAMMA, W/O LAZOUR, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT YEDDULAYENI VILLAGE, PEDDAJUTURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, VEMULA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in appointing the 5th respondent as Anganvadi Worker for Yeddulayeni Village of Vemula Mandal of Kadapa District contrary to the guide lines prescribed in notification is illegal, arbitrary in violation of guidelines and in violation of Art.14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to appoint the petitioner as Anganvadi Worker for Yeddulayeni Village of Vemula Mandal of Kadapa District in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 4879 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to make an enquiry on the complaint dt.4-12-2006 and take steps to appoint the petitioner as Anganvadi worker for Yeddulayeni Village of Vemula Mandal of Kadapa District in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S D GOWD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N SASIKALA 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following order: It is brought to the notice of this Court that, as the petitioner’s counsel died, this court ordered notice to the sole petitioner through registered post which was served on 31.05.2025. Despite the service of notice, the petitioner did not choose to put up appearance. It shows that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the matter. Since the matter is of the year 2007 and the petitioner is having no interest in prosecuting the matter, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending if any shall stand closed. ______________________ RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J BRS