CHHEDIYA ORAON ALIAS MANGRA ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHANSD
B.A./2315/2024 · 2025-06-18
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7736 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7736 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:15999 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2315 of 2024
------ Chhediya Oraon @ Mangra Oraon, aged about 39 years, son of late Bandhya Oraon, resident of Village-Chatakpur, P.O.- Barhi, P.S.-Barhi, Dist.-Lohardaga, Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Altamash Khan, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.07 Dated- 18.06.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Senha P.S. Case No.113 of 2023 (G.R. No. 592 of 2023) registered for the offences punishable under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons has committed the murder of Bajrang Baitha. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and admittedly, Bajrang Baitha was using force against the daughter of the petitioner demanding country made liquor and in the consequential hot exchange of words and in a fit of anger the petitioner assaulted the deceased with a bamboo along with his brother. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.09.2023, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 05 of the bail application and the petitioner had no intention to kill Bajrang Baitha. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.S.J.-III, Lohardaga, in connection with Senha P.S. Case No.113 of 2023 (G.R. No. 592 of 2023) with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/