Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77338 (MAD)

SIVAKAMI RAMESH v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

CRL RC/1565/2023 · 2025-06-25

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.R.C.No.1565 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.R.C.No.1565 of 2023 Sivakami Ramesh ..... Petitioner Vs State by The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, CCB-I, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007. ..... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the dismissal order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB and CBCID Metro Cases in Crl.M.P.No.43575 of 2022 dated 13.02.2023 and to direct the respondent Police to register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated 04.03.2022. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Criminal Revision has been filed challenging the order dated 13.02.2023 passed in Crl.M.P.No.43575 of 2022 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB and CBCID Metro Cases, Egmore, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.1565 of 2023 Chennai, thereby dismissing the petition filed under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. seeking a direction for registration of an FIR. 2. The petitioner lodged a complaint. However, it was not taken for consideration and as such, the petitioner filed a petition seeking a direction under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. for registration of the FIR. 3. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4. A perusal of the complaint reveals that the petitioner, who is the mother of the accused, had lodged a complaint as against her son and daughter- in-law. The entire allegations are civil in nature with regard to the property and money transactions between them. Therefore, no prima facie case is made out to constitute any cognizable offence. As such, the Trial Court rightly rejected the petition filed under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C, seeking a direction for registration of an FIR. 5. In view of the above, this Court finds no infirmity or illegality https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.1565 of 2023 in the order dated 13.02.2023 passed in Crl.M.P.No.43575 of 2022 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB and CBCID Metro Cases, Egmore, Chennai. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed. 25.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order Lpp To 1. The Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB and CBCID Metro Cases, Egmore, Chennai 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, CCB-I, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.1565 of 2023 Lpp Crl.R.C.No.1565 of 2023 25.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis